Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
EMAIL #27 (of 28)
(sent to every single US Governor and every single US Senator)INTERNATIONAL LEGISLATION: Thought Recording Technology and Telepathy
Good day,
The development of international legislation to protect our personal and national sovereignties will force us to consider some of the most basic fundamental questions. Questions we have never had to consider…
Are our thoughts really ours…
Whatty – ??? 2024/5 (a while ago)Who owns thoughts…
Whatty – Oct 2025The above questions of course not being as easy as it may seem given that we communicate autonomously at the subconscious level.
The relevancy of established paradigms such as IP Protection, Patents and First to Publish now questionable once this technology gives us access to thoughts.
These will be highly contested discussions as every jurisdiction will be impacted, even those without this technology or the resources to acquire or achieve it.
We must be cautious to ensure that our current mindsets do not create overly restrictive legislation and a dangerous precedence in this regard that will be difficult to unseat and thus limiting ourselves and who we are.
If you take the time to consider the above thoroughly you will come to the same conclusion as I that this will impact society in profound ways.
All of this needs to occur before Thought Recording Technology hits mainstream adoption, tor this clearly represents a future path of this type of technology
And thus the importance of definitive proof of Telepathy no matter how achieved.
Sincerely
Steven Whatmore
whatty.786@gmail.com
416.577.0057PS: This email and the various other emails are meant as a springboard for thought and discussion and there are substantially more aspects to this problem than what can be conveyed in a forum such as this.
PS: The current version of the PDF containing the entire set of emails related to Thought Recording Technology in PDF form: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fhh4psFYKivfVvJPVUERdoK2zbzDv4hr/view?usp=sharing
My name is Whatty – Can you hear me!
Go JAYS Go!
Go JAYS Go!
Go JAYS Go!EMAIL #24 (of 27)
(sent to every single US Governor and every single US Senator)DETECTION & ENFORCEMENT: RE: Thought Recording Technology and Telepathy
Good day,
Thought Recording Technology which will give us access to our thoughts and once we consider Telepathy combined with Thought Recording Technology it will give us access to each other’s thoughts poses a significant risk to Personal Privacy, Personal Security and ultimately National Security given that this technology can be applied to any individual.
The Governments and Security Agencies are barely aware of this problem (especially the Piezoelectric-based Microphone Technology problem), something that needs to change shortly before other individuals and organizations discover what I have presented and / or improve this technology to the point where it can be taken advantage of.
In my opinion the Governments and Security Agencies are ill-prepared to address this problem, although I am sure that this was the basis of concern behind decades of research conducted by several Governments and Organizations in the study of Telepathy.
In the area of detection and enforcement, typically the focus of the security agencies we have:
No idea how to detect…
No idea how to enforce…
No comprehensive and cohesive legislation in which to base these strategies…
We don’t even know what constitutes a legitimate versus illegitimate use of this technology and the information that can be acquired with it, especially considering this information is free-flowing and available to anyone with the ability to ‘listen’.
Further complicating this situation is.
Given that our brains support sound and correspondingly first person voice it will be very difficult to distinguish between recorded spoken communication and recorded thought communication.
Whatty – Sept 2025The above being yet another concern that the Governments and Security Agencies need to consider in the use of this technology and development of detection and enforcement strategies.
We aren’t even close to establishing international legislation on this matter. In fact, we are even further away from international recognition of this problem which will be key in establishing all of the above.
International recognition of this problem is an absolute necessity given that Telepathy crosses geopolitical boundaries, which is supported by previous research and is what my examples demonstrate having successfully achieved this across distance (Toronto to Washington and Toronto to California).
The horizon for the above problem may not be that far off, in fact it may be considered a current problem given that it is possible today using PiezoElectric-based microphone technology, the very same technology which is being shipped in our devices worldwide.
This means that Government and Security Agencies need to start researching and devising solutions to this problem before it enters mainstream usage.
There are those that have stated we are in the information age and information is ‘king’. This technology will give us access to this information, information from any individual, potentially violating everyone’s personal sovereignty.
There are numerous countries that have never undertaken this type of research nor have access to this technology and are clearly in a position of disadvantage when compared to those that have.
Clearly there is a lot more to this than what can be conveyed in a forum such as this and I would be more than happy to discuss in detail.
I can be contacted via the details below.
Sincerely
Steven Whatmore
whatty.786@gmail.com
416.577.0057My name is Whatty – Can you hear me!
——————————
EMAIL #25 (of 27)
(sent to every single US Governor and every single US Senator as well as the top EEG devices manufacturers globally)NeuroToken Authorization Framework: RE: Thought Recording Technology and Telepathy
Good day,
There are many benefits to Thought Recording Technology in advancement of knowledge and understanding, potential future treatment advances and even economic benefits from organizations and jurisdictions participating in this type of research as well as continued development and application of this type of technology given that this is such a new and potentially burgeoning field.
This technology will be transformative to numerous fields of study, especially those ‘grey matter’ fields of study (psychology, cognitive science, etc.) and as such should not be prohibitively restrained. These prohibitive restraints of course a most likely default stance for those security conscious organizations given the risks that this technology represents.
Thus, we need to have the appropriate controls in place to allow for the many beneficial and legitimate uses of Thought Recording Technology while guarding against the illegitimate uses.
The following presents one of many potential solutions to this problem.
NeuroToken Authorization Framework
<span style=”text-decoration: underline;”>Defintions:</span>
NeuroToken a single or multi-use secure authorization token that gives access to and use of any Neuro-Enabled Platform.
Neuro-Enabled Platform: any technology, device or platform that supports the playback, recording or storage of the electrical signals the human brain produces, typically referred to as NeuroData.
NeuroData: data collected from the electrical signals that the human brain produces.
Neuro-Pathic Data: is NeuroData that includes any Telepathic communications.
(alternatively, the definition of NeuroData can be expanded to include Neuro-Pathic Data)<span style=”text-decoration: underline;”>Framework:</span>
Thus the NeuroToken Authorization Framework would be a centrally managed and controlled (or federated) system that allows for the legitimate uses of this technology complete with automated collection, interpretation and reporting of the uses of NeuroData while guarding against illegitimate uses. Any interested country or organization would be able to utilize this framework to ensure that this technology is not being used to access information (especially on key individuals) in an inappropriate manner.
Any Neuro-Enabled Platform will need to be integrated into this platform in a secure and sealed manner to ensure that these controls cannot be circumvented and therefore allowing for misuse.
There will be strong motivation on behalf of all countries to consistently apply and enforce such a framework, complete with the adoption of new comprehensive legislation, due to the risk that this technology represents to a country’s sovereignty and personal sovereignty of its population.
This of course represents a significant challenge since the creation and adoption of a framework such as this takes time, especially at the international level. This is something that needs to change shortly before this technology and what I have presented starts being used in a mainstream manner.
This framework must be universally agreed to and consistently applied and enforced by all countries for it to be effective, especially considering that Telepathy does not obey geopolitical boundaries.
In lieu of global acceptance of this type of framework we will see the advent of Neuro-Neutral jurisdictions which can be taken advantage of in numerous ways. This is akin to what we see with Tax Havens where individuals and organizations can circumvent policies and legislations that they otherwise deem overly restrictive.
This framework does not address the existing PiezoElectric-based microphone technology problem which will need to be addressed separately. It also does not address existing Neuro-Enabled platforms which will need to be properly tracked and deprecated at end-of-life cycles to ensure that this technology is not inappropriately repurposed. Fortunately, most countries already have existing tracking processes and systems in place for restricted technologies and we should be able to piggyback on these systems for this purpose.
Clearly there is a lot more to this than what can be conveyed in a forum such as this and I would be more than happy to discuss in detail.
I can be contacted via the details below.
Sincerely
Steven Whatmore
whatty.786@gmail.com
416.577.0057My name is Whatty – Can you hear me!
——————————
EMAIL #26 (of 27)
(sent to every single US Governor and every single US Senator)HUMAN RIGHTS: Thought Recording Technology and Telepathy
Good day,
Our basic inalienable human rights, our personal sovereignty, has to be expanded to include our thoughts…
Whatty – Oct 2025Given that we are all sharing our thoughts this is a very complex area which requires serious consideration at the international level, especially considering:
Where does one individual’s thoughts begin and another individual’s thoughts end, in the era of Telepathy…
Whatty – Oct 2025The type of legislation first introduced in the State of Colorado with support by the NeuroRights Foundation does not even come close to protecting our rights, our personal sovereignty.
This type of legislation which was originally introduced at the state level in the USA will ultimately need to be promoted to the federal level in an effort to protect the country’s sovereignty and national interests as well as provide a cohesive, consistent and comprehensive framework to protect the personal sovereignty of its population.
This is something which my country and my government (Canada) has yet failed to recognize (how about yours?).
Finally, something to ponder given that we all share our thoughts.
Us…
Whatty – Oct 2025Sincerely
Steven Whatmore
whatty.786@gmail.com
416.577.0057My name is Whatty – Can you hear me!
-
AuthorPosts
